Cited by 105Wildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife ManagementAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Northern Yellowstone elk after wolf restoration

White, P. J., Garrott, Robert A.·2005·Wildlife Society Bulletin

Abstract

We analyzed counts, vital rates, and limiting factors for northern Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) before and after wolf (Canis lupus) restoration in 1995–1996 to evaluate predictions that elk numbers would move to a lower equilibrium point with corresponding density-related changes in vital rates. Elk counts decreased from approximately 17,000 in 1995 to 8,335 in 2004. Pregnancy rates for prime-age females (3–15 years) during 2000–2003 were high (0.90) and similar to those during 1950–1967 when elk density was 30% lower (5–9 elk/km2). The survival rate for prime-aged females was 0.85 (95% Cl = 0.81–0.87) compared to 0.99 when harvests were low and wolves absent. The proportions of elk harvested each year increased as elk numbers decreased during 1990–2002 but departed from this anti-regulatory trend as permit levels were reduced in 2003–2004. Snow pack strongly influenced elk vulnerability to hunting by increasing migration to lower elevations. Thus, harvests removed a relatively constant proportion (27±5%) of animals that migrated out of the park each year, primarily prime-aged females with high reproductive value. Conservative estimates of wolf off-take (>1,000 elk) exceeded harvests by 2003, with wolves primarily selecting calves and older elk with lower reproductive value. Recruitment decreased as the ratio of wolves to elk increased, and wolves maintained high kill rates and rapid population growth despite a 50% decrease in elk counts. Elk numbers likely will continue to decrease until 1) levels of harvest and predation decrease sufficiently, 2) there is sufficient time for recruitment of calves to prime breeding age, and 3) there is a numerical response of wolves to fewer elk. We recommend that managers quickly adjust antlerless permit quotas to population size in a density-dependent manner so that harvests do not accelerate the decrease in elk numbers.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[942:nyeawr]2.0.co;2

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 32 references

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lemke, 1998, Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 4, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Metadata

Authors
White, P. J., & Garrott, R. A.
Affiliations
  • National Park Service (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • White, P. J.
  • Garrott, Robert A.
Venue
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
942-955
ISSN
  • 0091-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5463
OpenAlex
W2105465249
Cited by
105
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wildlife Society Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
elk, wolf reintroduction, wolf, red deer, elk population dynamics, density dependence, recruitment (biology), snowpack, elk migration, wolf predation, Yellowstone National Park, wildlife management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review